|Earl the Squirrel's Rule #18|
For example, we have the infamous "New Yorker poem", so named because of TNY's notorious practice of publishing bad poems by celebrity poets. Such work might bump yours out of contention, only to lose out to something written by a bigger celebrity. Ç'est la vie.
(Personally, I can understand¹ this in an insecure publication that is trying to get established. They may need that name on their masthead. For an established magazine to do this strikes me as abdicating their primary responsibility as a filter; it is elitist and, at the same time, pathetic. But I digress...)
In fact, it wouldn't even be right to say that "the game is afoot". The real struggle hasn't begun. To be read, that poem and publication still have to be sold to an indifferent audience. Even then, readers might be more interested in the interviews and articles than the verse.
"Okay, so the publisher and I find a way to get the lion's share of poetry readers. We even beat out the hit counts for Pixel and Stage poets. Now I'm a winner, right?"
You've won a preseason game. The championship is a long way off.
Unless we like being ignored, it's time to consider our goal and the opposition.
"What do you think of the latest James Bond flick?" Or last week's episode of "The Big Bang Theory"?²
In the last half century you would not hear³: "What did you think of the poem in yesterday's paper?" Or of a poetry book like "Songs of a Sourdough" (as we might in 1907)? Obviously, today's poetry is outside our society's mainstream.
As poets, our goal is for our words to be heard and remembered as part of the culture at large.
The bad news is that our competition is not simply every other poet vying for our publisher's favor, or even every other piece in every other publication. It is every poem, song, movie, novel, play, television or radio show, if not every pastime available to consumers today. Until everyone understands this neither your poem nor anyone else's has any practical chance of success.
The good news is that, frankly, most of our competitors suck.
¹ - I don't necessarily agree with or condone it but I do understand it.
² - Perhaps we should take a tip from Shakespeare--he knew a thing or two about succeeding with poetry--and write scripts? Or from Bernie Taupin and write song lyrics?
³ - Is it worth noting that, in addition to the "It's a Bundyful Life (Part 1)" ("Married with Children", Season 4, Episode 11, airing on December 17th, 1989), we saw nothing but rhyming couplets on "Bedtime Stories" ("How I Met Your Mother", Season 9, Episode 11, airing on November 25, 2013)?
I think not.
- 12 Things Poets Get Backwards - Part I
- 12 Things Poets Get Backwards - Part II
- 12 Things Poets Get Backwards - Part III
- 12 Things Poets Get Backwards - Part IV
- 12 Things Poets Get Backwards - Part V
- 12 Things Poets Get Backwards - Part VI
- 12 Things Poets Get Backwards - Part VII
- 12 Things Poets Get Backwards - Part VIII
- 12 Things Poets Get Backwards - Part IX
- 12 Things Poets Get Backwards - Part X
- 12 Things Poets Get Backwards - Part XI
- 12 Things Poets Get Backwards - Part XII
Your feedback is appreciated!
Please take a moment to comment or ask questions below or, failing that, mark the post as "funny", "interesting", "silly" or "dull". Also, feel free to expand this conversation by linking to it on Twitter or Facebook. Please let us know if you've included us on your blogroll so that we can reciprocate.
If you would like to contact us confidentially or blog here as "Gray for a Day" please use the box below, marking your post as "Private" and including your email address; the moderator will bring your post to our attention and prevent it from appearing publicly.
We look forward to hearing from you.
Earl Gray, Esquirrel