|Dennis Hammes (1945-2008)|
If your exposure to e-poetry is limited to a few webzines and the blogosphere you probably think of "online poetry" as...well, poetry that is online: ditties on Facebook, collections on vanity pages or the blogosphere, or quality works on e-zines (e.g. TheHyperTexts, The Pedestal, etc.) and e-versions of magazines (e.g. Rattle, Poetry, etc.).
Those who have been part of the online poetry community for more than a few years use the expression to describe someone whose aesthetics were, in whole or in part, developed and/or shared in online workshops.
If this group were to have a motto it might be: "Be teachable. We can work with the clueless but not the clueproof." More succinct is Scavella's Mantra: "You aren't as good as you think you are."
The core difference between the print and pixel mindset is the immutable versus the improvable. This is reflected in the media themselves. When a number of critics and advisors pointed out errors in a popular textbook the author did a recall and reprint--an awkward process in a hardcover listed at $95.00! When we bloggers or e-zine editors make mistakes we thank the reader, make the correction without much cost or bother, and move on. By definition, onliners invite critique; criticism of printed work is rare and not always welcome.
Other poets of their calibre, some of whom may be familiar to you, do present their works-in-progress for constructive critique. Theirs is an equally simple motivation: they believe in improvement of poems and poets.
The preamble to this article hints at the significance of this tiny community. We might wonder: how did it come into being and what else has it contributed to the whole?
Origins of Online Information Exchange:
|Michael McNeilley (1947-2001)|
Email protocols, standardized in 1973, added a carbon copy feature soon afterwards. This paved the way for the discussion list: roughly, people sending out Round Trip Memos. After Information Technologists and other scientists, English Departments were the third to employ this new technology and the first to expand Internet use to non-academics: journalists, novelists and poets.
|J. R. Sherman|
Here is a provocative factoid for you: had people cared to use the available technology, the rec.arts.poems newsgroup would have been the first venue where all poets in a postliterate society could have been gathered in one location. If humankind had produced an iconic poem in the half century before Facebook it would probably have happened on Usenet. It was the only game in town.
Not counting Dr. Seuss nursery rhymes, would you care to guess the title² of the best known poem among poets in the last three decades?
|Peter John Ross|
World Wide Web:
The World Wide Web started in 1993 but it wasn't until the mid-to-late 1990s that browsers and public interest developed. Among the first critical sites was Bela Selendy's "Poetry Free-For-All" or "PFFA", which grew directly out of the need for Usenetters to find a moderated forum, sans trolls. People who complain about how sharp some of the PFFA critics and moderators can be need do no more than Google "rec.arts.poems" to understand why. Today, when you see the guidelines of an online workshop you are reading the "don't-crit-the-crit" ethos developed by Usenetters.
What were the lessons we could draw from from the egoless experiment? Nothing onliners didn't already know, really:
- Selfless, informed critiquers like Hannah Craig and Aidan Tynan are gold;
- very few poets are interested in a careful, objective evaluation of their work, even if rendered politely and received anonymously; and,
- the social aspect of a workshop is important.
Which of these venues would I recommend to those eager to improve their technique? Such individuals should join and lurk on all of them, really, but if new to the study of the craft--regardless of how many decades they've been writing or teaching poetry--I'd encourage them to learn the basics before joining in. Those who know that Edna St. Vincent Millay's "Moriturus" is neither iambic nor free verse should consider Eratosphere.
|Margaret Ann Griffiths|
Let me leave you with one final touchstone. It doesn't matter if you edit or have been published in a hundred webzines, have run a popular blog for years and have the world's largest poetry newslist. If you don't know who Margaret Ann Griffiths is you are not an onliner. Period. It follows that if you want to understand this community you will find no better starting point.
¹ - Make that 11. Since we posted this, Gail White won her second consecutive Nemerov. Congrats, Gail!
² - The ultimate filler-and-killer poem, "Hookers", written by Marco Morales in 1995, is familiar to all rec.arts.poems denizens--that is, to everyone who engaged in any open online poetry discussion at that time.
Missing you again
I embrace shallow graves.
Pale faces, doughlike breasts
help me forget.
Your feedback is appreciated!
Please take a moment to comment or ask questions below or, failing that, mark the post as "funny", "interesting", "silly" or "dull". Also, feel free to expand this conversation by linking to it on Twitter or Facebook. Please let us know if you've included us on your blogroll so that we can reciprocate.
If you would like to contact us confidentially or blog here as "Gray for a Day" please use the box below, marking your post as "Private" and including your email address; the moderator will bring your post to our attention and prevent it from appearing publicly.
We look forward to hearing from you.
Earl Gray, Esquirrel