Law of Poetry #72 |
1. Song Lyrics
2. Humor/Parody
3. Narrational Poetry
4. Embedded Poetry
5. Occasional Poetry
Law of Poetry #171 |
We asked readers in four different active forums--novice, expert, blog, and social media--to imagine a serious poem (not song) that they might pass on to friends. No response. Not only could people not write an interesting poem, they couldn't even imagine one. This is to say that not only is English language poetry dead, but we can't envision it being alive. (N.B.: In non-anglophone demographics people cannot fathom a society where poetry is dead, a country where few can recite a stanza written this century.)
Law of Poetry #141 |
Novelists, playwrights, and journalists do not present their work as "prose". Similarly, poets need to categorize their work by genre (e.g. comedy, drama, news, political commentary, romance, sports, horror, etc.), not mode of speech (i.e. prose versus poetry).
In the coming days we hope to address ways to use context to attract--or at least to not alienate--an audience.
What about readership?
Poetry is a mode of speech, predating the advent of writing by millennia. People read poems with a view toward quoting, if not performing, them--in their imaginations, at the very least. Listening and reading were a chicken-and-egg scenario, but in this case hearing came first, anthropologically at the macrocosmic level and chronologically in microcosm. Reading a poem allowed us to, among other things, examine why it worked so well when we heard it.
Put simply, if there is no audience, how can their be a readership? Why would anyone want to study failure?
Of course there are some people who take context too far. The conceptualists for example. Most of their poems are very boring, and when you get over the fact they're just New York Times's with line breaks, then you realise they're pretty average.
ReplyDeleteRegards,
W T Clark
Some people missed the class on Rule #25:
Delete"The fact that it's boring doesn't mean it's poetry."